Collective rationality and monotone path division rules
نویسنده
چکیده
We impose the axiom Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives on division rules for the conflicting claims problem. With the addition of Consistency and Resource Monotonicity, this characterizes a family of rules which can be described in three different but intuitive ways. First, a rule is identified with a fixed monotone path in the space of awards, and for a given claims vector, the path of awards for that claims vector is simply the monotone path truncated by the claims vector. Second, a rule is identified with a set of parametric functions indexed by the claimants, and for a given claims problem, each claimant receives the value of his parametric function at a common parameter value, but truncated by his claim. Third, a rule is identified with an additively separable, strictly concave social welfare function, and for a given claims problem, the amount awarded is the maximizer of the social welfare function subject to the constraint of choosing a feasible award.
منابع مشابه
Judgment Aggregation by Quota Rules: Majority Voting Generalized
The widely discussed discursive dilemmashows that majority voting in a group of individuals on logically connected propositions may produce irrational collective judgments. We generalize majority voting by considering quota rules, which accept each proposition if and only if the number of individuals accepting it exceeds a given threshold, where di¤erent thresholds may be used for di¤erent pr...
متن کاملDecision Rules and Group Rationality: Cognitive Gain or Standstill?
Recent research in group cognition points towards the existence of collective cognitive competencies that transcend individual group members' cognitive competencies. Since rationality is a key cognitive competence for group decision making, and group cognition emerges from the coordination of individual cognition during social interactions, this study tests the extent to which collaborative and...
متن کاملEfficient solutions to bargaining problems with uncertain disagreement points
We consider a cooperative model of bargaining where the location of the disagreement point may be uncertain. Based on the maximin criterion, we formulate an ex ante efficiency condition and characterize the class of bargaining solutions satisfying this axiom. These solutions are generalizations of the monotone path solutions. Adding individual rationality yields a subclass of these solutions. B...
متن کاملJudgment aggregation without full rationality: a summary
Several recent results on the aggregation of judgments over logically connected propositions show that, under certain conditions, dictatorships are the only independent (i.e., propositionwise) aggregation rules generating fully rational (i.e., complete and consistent) collective judgments. A frequently mentioned route to avoid dictatorships is to allow incomplete collective judgments. We show t...
متن کاملCollective Identities and Citizenship
In the following I tI)' to show that there is an attractive notion of citizenship which is independent of any kind of collective identity. Citizenship is understood as one fonn of social interaction. It is argued that in order to understand social interaction adequate1y, it is necessary to introduce a structuraJ. theory ofpractical rationality, to the extent this conception of citizenship is ba...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- J. Economic Theory
دوره 154 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2014